Skip to main content

Hindu Marriage

 This article is written by Amisha Gupta pursuing B.A.LL.B from George School of Law (Calcutta University Department of Law)

HINDU MARRIAGE




Marriage is considered as a sacrament or contract, which gives rise to a status of legitimacy to the husband and wife and the children of the marriage. Among Hindus marriage is necessary, every Hindu must marry. The man is incomplete without his wife. The Hindu Marriage Act 1955 laid down a detailed rules covering practically all aspects of marriage in a simplified form.

Conditions Of A Valid Hindu Marriage

Section 5 of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955, has laid down the condition relating to solemnization of a valid Hindu marriage. A marriage may be solemnized between a Hindu male and female, if the following conditions are fulfilled, namely :

1. Monogamy - 

The husband or the wife shall not have a spouse living at the time of marriage. The intention is to prohibit bigamy, which is punishable under section 494 of Indian Penal Code 1860, the punishment of which is up to 7 years imprisonment and fine.
In Yamunabai v. Anantrao, 1988 SC 644, in the case of bigeminus marriage the second wife has no status of wife.

2. Mental Capacity -

Both the husband and wife must be capable of giving a valid consent at the the time of marriage. They must not be of unsound mind.
 They must be capable of giving a a valid consent, but not suffering from mental disorder of saccha kind or to such an extent as to be unfit for marriage and procreation of children. 
In Alka v. Abhinash 1991 MP 205, the Madhya Pradesh high court took the view that if the respondent was unfit for marriage or/and procreation of children.
They must be free from recurrent attacks of insanity (or epilepsy)¹.

3. Age - 

The bridegroom must complete the age of 21 years and The bride must complete the age of 18 years at the time of the marriage. The violation of this condition is punishable 15 days imprisonment or with fine upto Rs.1000/- or with both under Section 18 of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955. 
In Kokkula Suresh v. State of Andhra Pradesh, 2009 AP 52 - the Andhra Pradesh high court has held that under Hindu law marriage of minor girl below 18 years in neither void or voidable. Though facts and circumstances of this case where different that is the girl wanted to stay with the husband but parents wanted to bring her back. But while rendering the judgement of the honourable High Court seems to have overlooked Section 3 of prohibition of child Marriage Act 2006 which makes such marriage voidable at the instance of the minor spouse.

4. Prohibited Relationship -²

The parties of the marriage must not be related to each other within the degrees of prohibited relationship unless the customs usage provides otherwise and must not be opposed to public policy. Violation of this condition is punishable for imprisonment upto 1 month or with fine upto Rs.1000/- or with both under Section 18 of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955.

5. Sapinda Relationship -³

The parties of the marriage must not be 'Sapinda' of each other unless the custom or usage governing each of them permits of a marriage between the two. Infringement of this condition is punishable under section 18 of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955, and parties acquiring the marriage is liable for imprisonment upto 1 month or with fine upto Rs.1000/- or with both.

References

•The Hindu Marriage Act 1955.

• Dr. Paras Diwan's Modern Hindu Law, published by Allahabad Law Agency, Reprint -2017, 2018.

• ¹ - the word "or epilepsy" omitted by at 39 of 1999, S.2 (w.e.f.29-12-1999)

• ² and ³

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Legal Method: Case Study- People's Union for Civil Liberties [PUCL] vs. Union of India

  This article is written by Amisha Gupta pursuing B.A.LL.B from George School of Law (Calcutta University) People's Union for Civil Liberties [PUCL] vs. Union of India [AIR 1997 SC 568:(1997)1 SCC 301] Kuldip Singh and S. Saghir Ahmad,J B rief fact of the case: The petitioner, People's Union for Civil Liberties, a voluntary organisation filed a writ petition under article 32 of the contribution by the office of public interest litigation highlighting the incidents of telephone tapping in recent years. PUCL approached the Court on the basis of report on tapping of politicians' telephone by Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). The petitioner head challenged the validity of Section 5(2) of the Indian telegraph act 1885 which authorised the state to intercept messages only on the occurrence of any public emergency or in the interest of public safety, if it is satisfied that it is necessary for experience and to do so in five given situations, in the interests of: The soverei...

Legal Method: Case Study- D.K.Basu vs. State of West Bengal

  This article is written by Amisha Gupta pursuing B.A.LL.B from George School of Law (Calcutta University). D.K. Basu vs. State of West Bengal [(1997) 1 SCC 417:AIR 1997 SC 610:1996(9) SCALE] Justice Kuldip Singh & Justice A.S. Anand Brief facts of the case: Dr. D.K. Basu, Executive Chairman of Legal Aid Services of West Bengal, a non-political Organisation address a letter to Chief Justice drawing his attention to certain news items published in the Telegraph, the Statesman and The Indian Express regarding deaths in police lockups and custody. This letter was treated as a writ petition by the court. Issue of the case: Whether, the crimes against persons in lockups or custody increasing day by day ? Whether, there is any arbitrariness of Policemen in arresting a person? Whether, there is any need to specify some guidelines to make an arrest? Judgement: The Apex Court assuming this letter as Public Interest litigation expressed its grave concern against such patent violation of...

Hindu Law: Application and key terms: Custom, Usage, Ancestor and Ancestress, Full blood, Half blood, Uterine blood, Sapinda relationship, Prohibited Relationship, Agnate, Cognate, legitimate, illegitimate, intestate, Heir

This article is written by Amisha Gupta pursuing B.A.LL.B from George School of Law ( Calcutta University ).   Application Hindu law applies to :- Any person who is a Hindu by religion in any of its forms or developments, including a Virashaiva, a lingayat or a follower of the Brahmo, Prarthana or Arya samaj; A person who is born of Hindu parents. If only one parent is a Hindu, a person can be a Hindu if he/she has been raised as a Hindu. Any person who is a Buddhist Jain or Sikh by religion; Any person abode in the territories to which this act extends who is not a Muslim, Christian, Parsi or Jew by religion. Any person who are not governed by any other religious law will be governed by Hindu law. Any person who is a convert or re-convert to the Hindu, Buddhist, Jain or Sikh religion. Key terms  1. Custom and Usage The term "custom" and "usage" signify any rule which having been certainly, continuously and uniformly observed for a long period of time and has obtain...